Notifications
Clear all

How tricky is it to make a window bigger?

105 Posts
102 Users
0 Reactions
2,371 Views
history854
Posts: 9
(@history854)
Active Member
Joined:

Yeah, I hear you on not sweating every little gap—especially with mineral wool, it’s pretty forgiving. I do wonder though, when you’re making a window opening bigger, have you run into issues with matching the old framing? Sometimes I find the older houses throw a curveball, like out-of-plumb studs or weird headers. I guess as long as you’re double-checking things are reasonably square and insulated, you’re probably fine... but I’ve definitely had to shim a bit more than I’d like. Anyone else ever just accept a little imperfection and move on?


Reply
cking16
Posts: 10
(@cking16)
Active Member
Joined:

- Definitely seeing the same thing with older framing—nothing’s ever quite square or plumb.
- Expanding window openings in pre-1950s houses, I almost expect to find at least one stud out of alignment or a header that’s undersized or oddly notched.
- Shimming is pretty much inevitable. I usually keep a stack of cedar shims handy and just work my way around until the new frame sits right.
- I try to get things within 1/8" or so, but honestly, sometimes you’re fighting the whole wall. If the siding or plaster’s already wavy, a perfectly square window can actually look off.
- Mineral wool is forgiving for those small gaps, like you said. For bigger voids, I’ll back it with a bit of rigid foam or even a scrap of plywood before insulating.
- One thing I always double-check: the new header size. Old houses sometimes have weird loads above windows, so I’ll oversize if I’m not sure.
- I use a long level and a laser line if possible, but at the end of the day, you’re working with what’s there. If the reveal is consistent and the window operates smoothly, I’m happy.
- Perfection’s nice, but chasing it in an old house can turn a weekend job into a month-long project. Sometimes “good enough” really is good enough, especially if you’re not compromising structure or weatherproofing.
- Had a job last year where the wall was out by nearly 3/4" over four feet. Ended up splitting the difference and hiding the worst of it with trim. No one’s noticed yet.

Not sure there’s ever a truly “easy” window enlargement in an old house, but as long as it’s insulated, flashed, and looks right from ten feet away, I call it a win.


Reply
huntereditor
Posts: 12
(@huntereditor)
Active Member
Joined:

You nailed it—sometimes you just have to accept that “close enough” is the right call, especially in those old places where nothing’s square to begin with. I always tell folks, if the window works and the trim hides the sins, you’re ahead of the game. Ever run into a spot where you had to get creative with flashing because of weird siding profiles? That’s usually where I end up scratching my head the longest.


Reply
Posts: 16
(@djones57)
Active Member
Joined:

Yeah, weird siding profiles are always where things get interesting. I’ve had to cut custom flashings more times than I can count, especially on those old lap sidings where nothing lines up and the window opening is half an inch out of level. Sometimes you just have to build up with extra layers of flashing tape or bend aluminum in ways it probably wasn’t meant to go. Ever dealt with old cedar shakes? That’s a whole other headache—trying to get a clean line and keep water out without making it look like a patch job.

I’ll agree, if the trim covers it and the window operates right, you’re usually fine. But I’ve seen guys skip on flashing details and end up with leaks down the road. I’d rather spend the extra half hour fiddling with it than come back for repairs later. Anyone else ever end up just making their own flashing pieces on the fly? Sometimes it feels like half the job is improvising...


Reply
Posts: 16
(@sarahgreen63)
Active Member
Joined:

Funny you mention cedar shakes—I ran into a place last fall where nothing was square and the shakes had been layered in every direction over the years. Ended up fabricating a couple of Z-flashings on site just to get things to line up and shed water. Do you find it’s tougher to get a good seal when making a window opening bigger, especially with old siding like that? I always wonder if folks have tricks for blending new flashing with the original layers without making it obvious.


Reply
jackr93
Posts: 17
(@jackr93)
Active Member
Joined:

Do you find it’s tougher to get a good seal when making a window opening bigger, especially with old siding like that? I always wonder if folks have tricks for blending new flashing with the original layers without making it obvious.

Definitely agree—cedar shakes that have shifted all over the place are a real challenge. When the opening gets bigger, I almost always end up peeling back way more siding than I planned, just to find a clean edge for tying in new flashing. Sometimes, I’ll run a bead of high-quality sealant behind the Z-flashing and feather in a layer of flexible flashing tape under the shakes. It doesn’t always look seamless, but it’s watertight. One trick I use is to stagger the cut lines on the shakes so they don’t all line up and scream “patch job.” Not perfect, but it helps the repair blend in.


Reply
Posts: 48
(@drummer573106)
Trusted Member
Joined:

- Had the same headache with my 1950s siding.
-

“I almost always end up peeling back way more siding than I planned, just to find a clean edge for tying in new flashing.”

- Yep, every time. It’s like opening a can of worms—one shake leads to five more.
- I found using colored caulk close to the stain helps hide seams a bit, but honestly, the texture never matches perfectly.
- If you’re picky about how it looks, sometimes it’s easier to just redo a whole section instead of patching. Not cheap, but less obvious in the end.


Reply
scottmentor
Posts: 27
(@scottmentor)
Eminent Member
Joined:

- Ran into this with my own place—thought making the window bigger would be a weekend thing, but ended up pulling way more siding than planned.
- Had to redo almost an entire wall section because patching just looked off.
- Colored caulk helps a bit, but yeah, never quite matches the old stuff.
- If you’re fussy about the look, sometimes biting the bullet and replacing a whole chunk is less frustrating in the long run.
- Not gonna lie, it’s more work and money than I expected... but at least it’s done right.


Reply
debbieb30
Posts: 13
(@debbieb30)
Active Member
Joined:

I totally get wanting the finished look to be seamless, but honestly, I’d push back a bit on the idea of just swapping out a big section of siding for aesthetics—especially if the rest of your exterior’s in good shape. There’s a bigger picture with energy efficiency that sometimes gets overlooked in these kinds of renos. When you open up a wall that much, you’re dealing with vapor barriers, insulation, and potential air leaks. If those details aren’t put back right, you might end up with drafts or even moisture issues down the road.

When I enlarged a window last year, I obsessed way more over air sealing and getting the flashing right than matching the siding perfectly. The caulk color mismatch bugged me at first, but in the end, I’d rather have a slightly off patch than risk losing heat all winter (my house is old and already drafty enough). Sometimes “done right” means prioritizing what you can’t see, not just what you can.

Curious if anyone else has noticed their heating bills jump after these kinds of projects... or maybe I’m just paranoid.


Reply
writing750
Posts: 17
(@writing750)
Active Member
Joined:

Sometimes “done right” means prioritizing what you can’t see, not just what you can.

Man, I learned that the hard way. First big project after moving in, I was way too focused on getting the trim to line up perfectly—meanwhile, I totally missed a gap in the insulation around the new window. Now there’s a weird cold spot in my living room that my dog loves but I do not. Honestly, if I could go back, I’d care less about the paint matching and more about not freezing my toes off every morning.


Reply
Page 7 / 11
Share: