Notifications
Clear all

How much time did you spend replacing your windows?

135 Posts
128 Users
0 Reactions
1,930 Views
Posts: 20
(@donaldb97)
Eminent Member
Joined:

Low-expansion foam is a solid choice, especially with older homes where the framing’s never quite square. It’s easy to get carried away on the first go—happens to everyone. The trick is short bursts and letting it expand before adding more. I’ve seen people try to fill huge gaps in one shot and end up with a mess to trim, or worse, bowing the frame if they use high-expansion by mistake.

One thing I’d add: temperature really affects how that foam sets up. If you’re installing in colder weather, it can take a lot longer to cure, and sometimes it doesn’t expand as much as you expect. In summer, though, it can go off fast and push out more than you want. I usually keep a utility knife handy and just accept there’ll be some trimming, but less is definitely better for cleanup.

On time spent—depends a lot on the number of windows and how much prep you do. I’ve done jobs where each window took under an hour start to finish, but that’s with everything prepped and measured. If you hit rot or have to re-square a frame, it’s a whole different story. Foam helps with minor gaps, but if the opening’s really out of whack, I still prefer shims for structure and just use foam for insulation.

I’ve also seen people skip taping off the area around the frame and regret it later. That stuff sticks to everything. Blue tape’s cheap insurance.

Curious if anyone’s tried the newer low-odor foams? I’ve stuck with the classic brands, but the fumes are no joke in a closed-up room.


Reply
Posts: 15
(@davidanimator)
Active Member
Joined:

I’ve also seen people skip taping off the area around the frame and regret it later. That stuff sticks to everything. Blue tape’s cheap insurance.

Totally learned this one the hard way—thought I could “just be careful” and next thing you know, there’s dried foam on my hardwood floors and my dog’s tail. Blue tape is now a must for me, even if it feels like overkill.

I’m with you on the low-expansion foam being good for older houses. Mine’s from the 60s, and nothing is square. I got a little overzealous with the foam on my first window and ended up with more shaving to do than I’d like to admit. There’s a certain art to those short bursts, but I still can’t seem to get it right every time.

About the fumes—yeah, they’re rough. I tried cracking all the windows in the room (which felt ironic since I was literally replacing them) but still ended up with that headache-y smell hanging around for hours. Haven’t tried any of the low-odor foams yet, mostly because I keep grabbing what’s cheapest at the hardware store. Are they actually better, or just slightly less terrible?

The temperature thing is real too. Did one window in early spring and it took forever to set up, then did another in July and had foam oozing out everywhere. Felt like Goldilocks looking for that “just right” moment.

Curious—anyone ever try those “window installation kits” with all the bits included? I keep seeing them online but haven’t taken the plunge. Worth it or just a bunch of extra stuff I’ll never use?


Reply
Posts: 18
(@josephfoodie)
Eminent Member
Joined:

Yeah, I hear you on the foam—there’s no such thing as being “too careful” with that stuff. I’ve definitely had to scrape a few mystery blobs off my floors (and once, my jeans). I’ve tried the low-odor foam a couple times and honestly, it’s a little better but not a total game changer. Still smells, just less punchy. As for those window kits, I bought one out of curiosity and ended up using maybe half the stuff. The rest is still sitting in my garage. Sometimes it’s nice having everything in one box, but if you’ve already got most of the basics, probably not worth the extra cost.


Reply
law_ben
Posts: 16
(@law_ben)
Active Member
Joined:

I actually found those window kits pretty handy, even though I had a lot of the basics already. For me, it was less about the cost and more about not having to run back and forth to the hardware store when I realized I was missing something halfway through.

“Sometimes it’s nice having everything in one box, but if you’ve already got most of the basics, probably not worth the extra cost.”
Maybe it’s just my luck, but every time I try to piece things together myself, I end up forgetting a little thing that slows me down. The kits aren’t perfect, but they saved me a headache or two.


Reply
Posts: 22
(@sambiker237)
Eminent Member
Joined:

I get the appeal of the kits, but honestly, I ended up with a bunch of leftover parts I never used.

“Maybe it’s just my luck, but every time I try to piece things together myself, I end up forgetting a little thing that slows me down.”
For me, making a list and double-checking before heading to the store saved more time than the kit did. Guess it depends on how organized you are (which, for me, is hit or miss).


Reply
Posts: 19
(@natemagician)
Eminent Member
Joined:

- Ran into the same thing with leftover hardware from kits—felt wasteful, honestly.
- When I did my windows, I skipped the kits and just listed out every single part (down to the last screw).
- Double-checking saved me a couple trips, but I still managed to forget caulk once... classic.
- For me, the extra planning upfront was worth it, but I get why folks go for the all-in-one approach if they’re short on time or patience.
- Guess it’s a tradeoff—organization vs. convenience.


Reply
vegan_barbara4194
Posts: 21
(@vegan_barbara4194)
Eminent Member
Joined:

Interesting take on skipping the kits. I get why listing out every part would help with organization, but I’m not totally convinced it always saves time or hassle. In my case, the kit actually kept me from running back and forth to the store—maybe just luck, but all the pieces were there and I didn’t have to double-check measurements or compatibility.

You mentioned:

“For me, the extra planning upfront was worth it, but I get why folks go for the all-in-one approach if they’re short on time or patience.”

I wonder if it’s less about patience and more about experience? I’ve done a few projects where making my own list led to missed details (like forgetting the right type of shims). The kits might be a bit wasteful sometimes, but for someone who doesn’t do this often, is it really less efficient overall? Or maybe it depends on how standard your windows are—mine were pretty basic, so maybe that’s why it worked out.

Curious if others found planning everything out actually saved them headaches long-term, or if the convenience factor tipped the scales.


Reply
sports986
Posts: 10
(@sports986)
Active Member
Joined:

I wonder if it’s less about patience and more about experience? I’ve done a few projects where making my own list led to missed details (like forgetting the right type of shims). The kits might be a bit wasteful sometimes, but for someone who doesn’t do this often, is it really less efficient overall?

I totally get what you mean about missing little things—my first go-around, I forgot backer rod and had to make an extra trip. Personally, I think experience does play a huge role. If you’ve done a few installs, you start to know what random bits you’ll need, and the custom approach makes sense. But for someone tackling just a window or two, the kit’s “all there in the box” factor is hard to beat, even if you end up with a couple extra parts.

My windows were older and not standard sizes, so I had to go the custom route. It took more time up front, but I avoided some weird fit issues in the end. If your windows are standard and you don’t want to sweat the details, I’d say kits are pretty efficient. Sometimes you just want the job done without overthinking it.


Reply
Posts: 8
(@william_sage2708)
Active Member
Joined:

- Totally hear you on the missed-details thing—my first window swap, I thought I had it all mapped out, then realized halfway through I didn’t have the right screws. Cue the last-minute hardware store run...
- Kits are a lifesaver if you just want to get it done and not stress every little piece. I’ve used them on a couple of standard windows and yeah, there were a few extra bits left over, but it felt a lot less intimidating than piecing everything together myself.
- Custom can be great if you’re picky or your house is older (mine’s from the ‘60s, nothing is square), but it’s definitely more of a project. There’s some satisfaction in getting it dialed in perfectly, but it’s not for everyone.
- I wouldn’t worry too much about “wasting” a few extra parts with a kit. Sometimes that peace of mind is worth it, especially if you’re only doing this once every decade or so.
- At the end of the day, both ways work—just depends on your comfort level and how much time you want to sink into the prep. You’re not missing anything by choosing the easier route, especially if it means less stress and fewer forgotten shims.

Honestly, if I were doing it over again, I might go the kit route for the sanity alone. Good on you for thinking it through and not overcomplicating it.


Reply
Posts: 10
(@ocean373)
Active Member
Joined:

- Still wrapping my head around all the steps, honestly. Haven’t actually swapped any windows yet, but reading these stories is making me lean toward a kit for sure.
- The idea of “extra parts” freaked me out at first, but I guess it’s better than realizing you’re missing something halfway through and having to sprint to the store in paint-covered sweatpants.
- My house isn’t super old (built in the late ‘80s), but nothing seems to line up quite right. Not sure if that’s normal or just my luck.
- Kind of relieved to hear that not everyone goes the custom route. I want it done, not perfect—if it keeps the cold out and looks okay, that’s a win.
- Prep time is what worries me most. I can handle a weekend project, but I don’t want it dragging on for weeks because I missed a tiny piece.

Maybe I’ll just embrace the “kit life” and call it a day...


Reply
Page 8 / 14
Share: