I once found a bird’s nest wedged behind a jamb. Makes you wonder what else is lurking behind the trim...
That’s wild—never found a whole nest, but I did pull out what looked like ancient newspaper stuffed in as insulation, dated from the 70s. It was barely doing anything for drafts. Always makes me think about how much energy we lose through those “hidden” gaps. Did you notice if your quote shot up more because of fixing rot, or was it all about upgrading the materials?
Funny how you mention the newspaper insulation—I’ve run into that too, and even some old wool rags stuffed in the gaps. It’s amazing what people used to try just to keep the drafts out. I agree, all those hidden spots can really add up when it comes to energy loss. I started poking around after my first winter in this house and realized just how much cold air was sneaking in around the original windows.
When I got quotes for new windows, the price definitely jumped more because of the hidden rot than the materials themselves. The sales pitch always focuses on the fancy glass or composite frames, but what really got me was when they started peeling back the trim and found some water damage. Suddenly, it wasn’t just a simple swap—it turned into a partial rebuild of the sills and some framing. That added a good chunk to the bill, and honestly, I wasn’t expecting it.
I will say, though, upgrading the materials did make a difference in the long run. The upfront cost stung, but the newer windows seal way better, and I’m not getting those ice-cold drafts anymore. Still, if you’re just looking at sticker shock, I’d say keep an eye on what’s lurking behind the woodwork. It’s always the stuff you can’t see that blows up the budget.
Kind of wild to think about all the random things people have found behind trim—nests, newspapers, you name it. Makes me wonder what else is hiding in these old houses. Anyway, you’re not alone in being surprised by those “hidden” costs. It’s frustrating, but at least now I know my windows aren’t just cosmetic—they’re actually keeping the weather out.
That hidden water damage is exactly what worries me with these older houses. I’ve always wondered if it makes more sense to do a full energy audit before starting any replacement—did you consider that, or just jump in after feeling the drafts? Sometimes I’m skeptical about how much the new windows alone can fix if the framing’s already compromised...
I totally get the worry about hidden water damage—been there. When we started noticing drafts in our 1950s ranch, I was tempted to just swap out the windows and call it a day. But after poking around a bit and finding some soft spots in the sills, I decided to go the extra mile and did a basic energy audit (not the full professional one, just a blower door test from a local guy). It actually helped pinpoint a couple spots where water had snuck in over the years, especially around the kitchen window.
What worked for me was this order: 1) check for visible damage, 2) do the audit, 3) open up the framing where it looked sketchy before installing anything new. Turned out two of the window frames needed way more repair than I would’ve guessed from just feeling a draft. I’m all for new windows, but if the framing’s rotted, you’re basically putting lipstick on a pig.
If you’re already seeing signs of trouble, it’s probably worth poking around a bit before you drop cash on fancy replacements. It’s not always fun, but it’s better than finding out the hard way later...
I hear what you’re saying about checking for rot before replacing windows, but I’m not totally convinced it’s always worth opening up the framing unless there’s really obvious damage. On my place (built in ’68), I had a couple spots that felt drafty, but when the installer came out, he used a moisture meter and said the wood was solid—even though it looked a little rough. I ended up just going with new windows and some extra flashing, and so far, no issues. Maybe I just got lucky, but sometimes poking around too much can open a can of worms that doesn’t need opening... Anyone else skip the full tear-out and have it work out?
I’ve done both—full tear-out on my old place and just a pocket install at this one. Honestly, the pocket install worked fine, and I didn’t notice any issues after. Sometimes it feels like the more you dig, the more you find... but if the wood tests solid, why mess with it?
Sometimes it feels like the more you dig, the more you find... but if the wood tests solid, why mess with it?
That line hits home. I once did a “quick” pocket install at my cousin’s 80s ranch, figuring we’d be in and out by lunch. Well, we popped the old sashes and—no joke—found a squirrel nest wedged behind the jamb liner. The wood actually looked fine from inside, but underneath? Total Swiss cheese. Ended up turning into a full tear-out anyway.
But you’re right, sometimes it’s just not worth chasing problems that aren’t there. If your sills and frames are solid, pocket installs can save a ton of time and money. The only thing I always wonder about is air infiltration—old houses settle weird, and sometimes those gaps show up years later. Anyone else ever get that drafty feeling even after new windows are in?
Guess my point is: I’m always poking around with a screwdriver just in case. Sometimes you win, sometimes you find squirrel condos.
The only thing I always wonder about is air infiltration—old houses settle weird, and sometimes those gaps show up years later.
That’s a real concern, especially with older framing that’s shifted over decades. I’ve had situations where everything seemed tight after install, but come the next winter, you’d feel a draft along the sill. Sometimes it’s just the insulation or caulking breaking down faster than expected. Out of curiosity, did your quote include any kind of air sealing or foam backer rod, or was it just basic install? I’ve noticed that can really change the final number, but also how comfortable the room feels down the line.
That’s a classic old house move—just when you think you’ve sealed every gap, winter finds the one you missed. I’ve seen foam backer rod make a big difference, especially in those weird spots where framing isn’t square anymore. But yeah, not every installer includes it by default. Did your quote break out the air sealing separately? Sometimes it’s buried in the fine print, sometimes it’s “extra.” Always feels like a bit of a gamble unless you ask for specifics.
Yeah, you really have to watch those itemized quotes. I’ve noticed some installers just lump “air sealing” in with “installation,” and unless you dig into the details, you won’t know if they’re using backer rod, caulk, spray foam, or just slapping in the window and calling it good. When I replaced a couple windows last year, only one company actually listed air sealing as a separate line item—and it was an extra $150 per window. At first, I thought it was just upselling, but after seeing how drafty my neighbor’s “budget install” turned out, I’m glad I paid for it.
Have you checked if your quote mentions the type of sealant or insulation? Sometimes you can negotiate to have them use higher-quality materials, even if it’s not standard. It’s a pain, but asking for those specifics up front can save a lot of hassle (and cold toes) later. Funny how the smallest gaps end up making the biggest difference in an old house...