Notifications
Clear all

Getting new windows in without the headaches: my step-by-step

183 Posts
178 Users
0 Reactions
1,343 Views
tyler_shadow
Posts: 24
(@tyler_shadow)
Eminent Member
Joined:

In the end, it’s always a messy adventure, but hey, lower energy bills are worth a little frustration, right?

Totally agree—messy but worth it. I’m still finding random bits of caulk on my shirt sleeves from last winter’s window project. Did you end up using those foam backer rods before caulking? I tried them for the first time and they actually helped fill some of the bigger gaps, but I wasn’t sure if it was overkill or not.


Reply
snowboarder56
Posts: 15
(@snowboarder56)
Active Member
Joined:

I’m still finding random bits of caulk on my shirt sleeves from last winter’s window project.

Haha, I can relate—caulk just has a way of showing up weeks later, like glitter after a craft project. As for the foam backer rods, I actually swear by them for bigger gaps. My house is old (think drafty 1950s ranch), so there were some spots where just caulk would’ve sunk in and disappeared. The rods made it way easier to get a smooth bead and use less caulk overall.

I wouldn’t call it overkill, especially if you’ve got uneven frames or those weird gaps that seem to go on forever. Only thing I found was sometimes they want to pop out if you don’t wedge them in tight enough—had one roll out mid-job and scare the heck out of me when it hit the floor.

Lower bills are nice, but not having to redo sloppy caulking every year is even better in my book.


Reply
charles_young
Posts: 13
(@charles_young)
Active Member
Joined:

Backer rods are such a weird little invention, right? I used to think they were just for professionals until I tried them on the monster gaps in my 60s split-level. The first time, I cut them too short and ended up fishing one out with needle-nose pliers—definitely learned my lesson there. Do you ever find that the caulk still shrinks back a bit over time, even with the rods? Or maybe that's just my drafty old windows doing their thing...


Reply
Posts: 12
(@pmoore63)
Active Member
Joined:

Do you ever find that the caulk still shrinks back a bit over time, even with the rods?

Yeah, that's pretty common, especially with older windows and if you're using standard acrylic caulk. Even with backer rods, some shrinkage happens as the caulk cures—silicone or high-quality polyurethane holds up better in my experience. The real trick is making sure the gap isn't too deep for the caulk to bridge. If it's more than 1/2", I actually double up the backer rod or use a larger diameter so the caulk sits right at that "hourglass" shape. Drafts from old frames definitely don't help either... sometimes it feels like a losing battle with these mid-century houses.


Reply
Posts: 26
(@carol_rogue)
Eminent Member
Joined:

The real trick is making sure the gap isn't too deep for the caulk to bridge. If it's more than 1/2", I actually double up the backer rod or use a larger diameter so the caulk sits right at that "hourglass" shape.

I get where you’re coming from, but I’m not totally convinced doubling up backer rods is always the answer. Sometimes stacking them can leave weird air pockets, and the caulk just ends up sagging or pulling away in spots. I’ve seen it more than once on jobs where someone tried to “fill” a big gap that way, and it didn’t really solve the shrinkage or cracking.

Honestly, I think if you’re dealing with gaps over half an inch, it might be time to rethink the window fit or even add some wood filler or foam first—otherwise, you’re just asking the caulk to do too much. Silicone and poly are definitely better than acrylic, but even those have limits if the prep isn’t right. Anyone else feel like sometimes we’re just patching over bigger issues with these old frames?


Reply
clee37
Posts: 18
(@clee37)
Eminent Member
Joined:

I’ve run into that too—doubling up on backer rod sometimes just leads to a mess, especially if the gap isn’t consistent. What’s worked for me is cutting thin strips of rigid foam and wedging those in first, then using a single layer of backer rod on top before caulking. That way I get a solid base and don’t have to rely on the caulk to do all the heavy lifting. Curious if anyone’s tried using wood shims or even minimal expanding foam for those bigger gaps? I always worry about overfilling and causing the frame to bow, but sometimes it feels like there’s no perfect solution with these old houses...


Reply
Posts: 11
(@foodie33)
Active Member
Joined:

I’ve actually tried wood shims in a couple spots where the gap was just too wide for backer rod alone, but I always worry about creating pressure points—especially if the window frame isn’t perfectly straight (which, let’s be honest, it never is in these old places). Expanding foam makes me nervous too, since it can push the jambs out of alignment if you’re not careful. Has anyone found a type of foam that gives just enough support without that risk? I keep thinking there has to be a middle ground between “too soft” and “frame warping disaster.”


Reply
Posts: 16
(@george_woof)
Active Member
Joined:

You’re not alone sweating over foam vs. shims—old houses really do have a way of keeping things interesting. I had the same paranoia about expanding foam. The “low-expansion” stuff is supposed to be safer, but in my 1920s place, even that made me nervous. One time I got a little overzealous and ended up with a bow in the frame that made the sash stick. Not fun.

What’s worked for me is using the minimal expanding window & door foam (the kind that specifically says it won’t bow frames), but I only do a little at a time. I’ll spray in short bursts, let it set, then check for movement before adding more. It takes longer, but I haven’t warped anything since I started being patient with it.

Honestly, there’s no perfect solution. Sometimes I’ll back up the foam with thin shims just to keep things steady, especially if the gap is wild in spots. You’re right—there’s a fine line between “cushy” and “disaster.” But you’re definitely on the right track thinking about pressure points and not just cramming stuff in. It’s a game of patience and compromise, like most things in these old houses.


Reply
Posts: 7
(@david_paws)
Active Member
Joined:

Man, you nailed it with the “cushy vs. disaster” bit—there’s just no universal hack when you’re dealing with old houses and their charmingly unpredictable gaps. I’m with you on the minimal expanding foam, but I’ll admit, I still get twitchy every time I pull out a can. Even the “safe for windows and doors” stuff can get a little wild if you’re not careful.

One thing I’ve started doing is dry-fitting the window with shims first, getting everything square and level, then using painter’s tape to mark where I want things to stay put. After that, I’ll go in with foam in tiny passes—like, think “sneeze and you’ll miss it” amounts. If the gap’s too big, I’ll double up on shims and only use foam as backup for insulation, not structure.

Had one job where I got lazy and just foamed it all in… six months later, the window wouldn’t open unless you gave it a full-on shoulder check. Lesson learned. These old frames just don’t forgive impatience or shortcuts.


Reply
charlie_woof
Posts: 50
(@charlie_woof)
Trusted Member
Joined:

Gotta admit, I’m a little more pro-foam than most folks here. I get the horror stories—

Had one job where I got lazy and just foamed it all in… six months later, the window wouldn’t open unless you gave it a full-on shoulder check.
—but if you go slow and let each pass cure, foam can be a lifesaver for those weird old-house gaps. Especially when the frame’s not even close to square.

I do like your painter’s tape trick for marking things, but honestly, sometimes shims alone just don’t cut it in my place (1920s brick, nothing is straight). I’ve had better luck using backer rod to fill bigger voids before the foam goes in. That way, you’re not relying on foam for structure or overfilling by accident.

Not saying shortcuts are ever a good idea, but sometimes you gotta pick your battles with these old houses. If I waited for perfect alignment every time, half my windows would still be leaning in the garage...


Reply
Page 3 / 19
Share: