Which matters more to you: original wood windows or modern replacements?

I totally get where you’re coming from. My place is a 1935 colonial and I went back and forth for months. Ended up restoring the originals and adding weatherstripping—definitely more work, but they just have so much character. The drafts are better now, but I won’t lie, it’s not as airtight as new ones would be. Still, every time I look at them, I’m glad I kept ‘em. If you love the look, it might be worth the hassle.

Still, every time I look at them, I’m glad I kept ‘em.

I’m kind of torn on this, honestly. My house is a 1950s ranch and the original wood windows were in rough shape when I moved in. I tried fixing up one as a test—sanded, painted, new glazing, weatherstripping, the works. It looked great but man, it was a project. Like you said, “it’s not as airtight as new ones would be,” and I noticed the same thing. Even with weatherstripping, there’s still a bit of a draft on windy days.

That said, I do like the character they add. But I ended up replacing most of them with modern wood-clad ones that mimic the old style. Honestly, my heating bill dropped and opening them is way less of a hassle now. Sometimes I miss the wavy glass and old hardware, though. If you’re willing to put in the work and don’t mind a little imperfection, originals are cool. But for me, I guess comfort won out in the end.

Sometimes I miss the wavy glass and old hardware, though. If you’re willing to put in the work and don’t mind a little imperfection, originals are cool. But for me, I guess comfort won out in the end.

I totally get where you’re coming from. I wrestled with the same decision a few years back. My place is a mid-40s Cape Cod, and those original windows had a ton of charm but were drafty as heck. I tried restoring one too, just to see if it was worth the effort. It looked great after, but wow, it was way more work than I expected. And like you said, even with new weatherstripping, I could still feel a bit of a breeze on colder days.

That said, I do kind of miss the character—especially the old glass that isn’t quite flat. There’s something about the way the light comes through those panes that feels different. But honestly, after swapping most of them for modern double-hungs (I went with wood interiors and aluminum exteriors), my energy bills dropped noticeably. Plus, they’re so much easier to open and clean. I find myself actually using the windows now, instead of just leaving them shut all winter.

One thing I didn’t expect: the new windows are almost *too* perfect. No little rattles, no quirky hardware, just smooth and quiet. Sometimes I think the house lost a bit of its “soul,” if that makes sense. But then again, not having to scrape ice off the inside in January is a big win.

I wonder if anyone’s tried a hybrid approach—maybe keeping a few of the most visible old windows (like in the living room) and updating the rest? Might be a decent compromise between comfort and character.

Curious if anyone else has found a way to get the best of both worlds, or does it always come down to picking one or the other?

I’m in the middle of this right now, actually. My house was built in 1937 and the windows are all original, but they’re rough—paint peeling, a couple panes cracked, and most are stuck shut half the year. I looked into restoring them myself and honestly, it’s a lot. Here’s what I’ve figured out so far:

1. Took one window out and stripped the paint (heat gun + scraper). That alone took me a weekend.
2. Reglazed the glass, which was kind of satisfying but way more fiddly than I thought.
3. Repainted, then tried to add weatherstripping. Still drafty, but not as bad.

After all that, it looks great but I’m not sure I want to do it 13 more times. The cost for a pro to restore them is pretty high—quoted almost $800 per window.

I get what people are saying about the character, though. The old glass has a weird charm, and the wavy reflections are cool. But when it’s 10°F outside, I’d rather not feel the wind coming in around the sash.

I’m leaning toward a mix: keep the big front windows (the ones you see from the street) and maybe the ones in the dining room, then replace the rest with modern wood-clad ones that match the style. That way I don’t lose all the old details, but I also don’t have to freeze or spend every weekend fixing windows.

Not sure if that’s the “right” answer, but it seems like the only way I’ll stay sane (and warm). If anyone’s debating this, I’d say try restoring one before committing either way—it’s a good reality check.

Totally get where you’re coming from—restoring old windows is like a weird mix of archaeology and punishment. Did you find the glazing part as messy as I did? I swear, I had putty in my hair for days. I ended up doing just the street-facing ones too, and honestly, my weekends thanked me. Do you notice any big difference in noise or warmth between the old and new ones? I keep telling myself the charm is worth it, but my heating bill disagrees...

I keep telling myself the charm is worth it, but my heating bill disagrees...

I get the charm thing—old windows really do have that character you just can’t fake. But after I swapped out the ones in my 1920s bungalow for modern double-panes, my place actually felt warmer for the first time in forever. I was skeptical at first, but the difference in drafts and street noise was wild. I do miss the wavy glass, though. Part of me wonders if I could’ve done a better job restoring, but honestly, my utility bill is way happier now.

Totally get where you’re coming from. I used to be all about keeping everything original—my place is a 1935 Tudor, and those old windows were part of why I bought it in the first place. But after my first winter here, let’s just say I spent more time layering up than admiring the charm. The drafts were brutal, and the rattling during every windstorm drove me nuts.

I finally caved and put in double-pane replacements last year. Honestly, I was surprised by how much quieter it got inside, and my gas bill dropped way more than I expected. It’s not just about heat either—summer’s way more manageable now since the AC isn’t working overtime. Still, I do kind of miss that wavy glass when the light hits it right... there’s something about old glass that feels irreplaceable.

One thing I kinda regret is not looking into storm windows or interior inserts before going full replacement. Heard some folks manage to keep the look but improve efficiency that way. Guess it depends on how much time and money you want to throw at it. For me, saving on bills ended up mattering more than preserving every detail, but I definitely had to talk myself into it.

Funny thing is, nobody who visits even notices the difference unless I point it out. Maybe we obsess over this stuff more than we need to? Or maybe that’s just what happens when you own an old house…

Funny thing is, nobody who visits even notices the difference unless I point it out. Maybe we obsess over this stuff more than we need to?

Honestly, I think people *do* notice, just maybe not consciously. There’s a vibe that comes with those old windows—the glass, the hardware, even the way they open. I get the efficiency argument (trust me, I’m all about cutting down those bills), but in my last place, I went with interior storm inserts and it made a bigger difference than I expected. Not quite as perfect as full replacements, but way less landfill waste and I kept the original look. Sometimes the “obsessing” is part of what makes old houses feel special, you know?

- Worked on a 1920s bungalow last month—owner wanted to keep the original sashes, so we restored them and added custom storm windows.
- Energy bills dropped, but the house still had that old-school charm. You really can feel the difference when you walk in.
- Full replacements are cleaner, sure, but you lose the character. Sometimes it’s not just about what people see, it’s about how the place feels.
- Not everyone notices the details, but for folks who live there every day, it matters more than you’d think.